A Qualitative Study On Patients With Chronic Migraine With Medication Overuse Headache: Comparing Frequent And Non-Frequent Relapsers.
Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2018
Abstract:
Background.—It is common clinical experience that, after structured withdrawal, some patients with chronic migraine and
medication overuse headache (CM with MOH) are more prone than others to relapse and to be in need of further structured
treatments. Our aim was to explore similarities and differences between frequent relapsers (FRs) and non-frequent relapsers
(NFRs) by considering their point of view, perceptions, and perspective of their subjective experience with relapse into CM
with MOH.
Methods.—Patients were consecutively recruited on occasion of a structured withdrawal treatment and were interviewed
individually about their headache experience and their perspectives on relapse into CM with MOH. We considered FR
those patients requiring 2 or more structured withdrawals for MOH within 3 years. A narrative approach with no preconceived
coding schemes was employed. To facilitate coding, categorization and organization of data the software QRS
NVivo 11.0 was used: themes were defined as common to FR and NFR, or peculiar (by frequency or content) to one of
the 2 groups.
Results.—Sixteen patients (13 women; mean age of 53) were interviewed: 7 were classified as FRs. A total of 22 themes
emerged from 552 single quotations (the 10 most relevant covered 82% of the entire body of quotations). Four themes were
commonly reported by both FR and NFR patients, and 6 were peculiar to one group only. Common aspects included issues
connected to the dilemma between disclosing, concealing, and the feelings of isolation around MOH, the idea of being addicted
to medication, presence of anxiety, and the attempt to use non-pharmacological therapies as an alternative to medication.
Peculiar aspects included causal attribution (FRs attributed headache to uncontrollable factors); future expectations at
the time point of withdrawal (FRs were generally resigned); high-performance functioning (FRs believed they are “forced” to
reach high levels of performance as a consequence of others’ inability); coping strategies (FRs tended to “passively accept”
problems and showed avoidance-related behaviors). Moreover, FRs were less frequently aware of their problems and described
more frequently depressive symptoms.
Conclusions.—Our results highlight that some differences between FR and NFR patients with CM and MOH exist.
Frequent relapsers among patients with CM and MOH reported some important peculiarities of the lived experience of
having chronic migraine; clinicians should recognize these psychosocial aspects such as social relationships, future expectations,
the experience of illness, medication management, and how the withdrawal experience is regarded, as they may be
associated with frequent relapse into MOH.
medication overuse headache (CM with MOH) are more prone than others to relapse and to be in need of further structured
treatments. Our aim was to explore similarities and differences between frequent relapsers (FRs) and non-frequent relapsers
(NFRs) by considering their point of view, perceptions, and perspective of their subjective experience with relapse into CM
with MOH.
Methods.—Patients were consecutively recruited on occasion of a structured withdrawal treatment and were interviewed
individually about their headache experience and their perspectives on relapse into CM with MOH. We considered FR
those patients requiring 2 or more structured withdrawals for MOH within 3 years. A narrative approach with no preconceived
coding schemes was employed. To facilitate coding, categorization and organization of data the software QRS
NVivo 11.0 was used: themes were defined as common to FR and NFR, or peculiar (by frequency or content) to one of
the 2 groups.
Results.—Sixteen patients (13 women; mean age of 53) were interviewed: 7 were classified as FRs. A total of 22 themes
emerged from 552 single quotations (the 10 most relevant covered 82% of the entire body of quotations). Four themes were
commonly reported by both FR and NFR patients, and 6 were peculiar to one group only. Common aspects included issues
connected to the dilemma between disclosing, concealing, and the feelings of isolation around MOH, the idea of being addicted
to medication, presence of anxiety, and the attempt to use non-pharmacological therapies as an alternative to medication.
Peculiar aspects included causal attribution (FRs attributed headache to uncontrollable factors); future expectations at
the time point of withdrawal (FRs were generally resigned); high-performance functioning (FRs believed they are “forced” to
reach high levels of performance as a consequence of others’ inability); coping strategies (FRs tended to “passively accept”
problems and showed avoidance-related behaviors). Moreover, FRs were less frequently aware of their problems and described
more frequently depressive symptoms.
Conclusions.—Our results highlight that some differences between FR and NFR patients with CM and MOH exist.
Frequent relapsers among patients with CM and MOH reported some important peculiarities of the lived experience of
having chronic migraine; clinicians should recognize these psychosocial aspects such as social relationships, future expectations,
the experience of illness, medication management, and how the withdrawal experience is regarded, as they may be
associated with frequent relapse into MOH.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
chronic migraine, medication-overuse headache, withdrawal, relapse, qualitative study
Elenco autori:
Scaratti, Chiara; Covelli, Venusia; Guastafierro, Erika; Leonardi, Matilde; Grazzi, Licia; Rizzoli, Paul B.; D’Amico, Domenico; Raggi, Alberto
Link alla scheda completa:
Pubblicato in: