Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIECAMPUS
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Third Mission
  • Expertise & Skills

UNI-FIND
Logo UNIECAMPUS

|

UNI-FIND

uniecampus.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Third Mission
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

Validity, reliability and minimum detectable change of COSMED K5 portable gas exchange system in breath-by-breath mode

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2018
abstract:
Purpose
This study aimed to examine the validity, reliability and minimum detectable change (MDC) of the Cosmed K5 in breath by breath (BxB) mode, against VacuMed metabolic simulator. Intra and inter-units reliability was also assessed.

Methods
Fourteen metabolic rates (from 0.9 to 4 L.min-1) were reproduced by a VacuMed system and pulmonary ventilation (VE), oxygen consumption (VO2) and carbon dioxide production (VCO2) were measured by two different K5 units. Validity was assessed by ordinary least products (OLP) regression analysis, Bland-Altman plots, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), mean percentage differences, technical errors (TE) and MDC for VE, VO2, and VCO2. Intra- and inter-K5 reliability was evaluated by absolute percentage differences between measurements (MAPE), ICCs, TE, and MDC.

Results
Validity analysis from OLP regression data and Bland- Altman plots indicated high agreement between K5 and simulator. ICC values were excellent for all variables (>0.99). Mean percentage differences in VE (-0.50%, p = 0.11), VO2 (-0.04%, p = 0.80), and VCO2 (-1.03%, p = 0.09) showed no significant bias. The technical error (TE) ranged from 0.73% to 1.34% (VE and VCO2 respectively). MDC were lower than 4% (VE = 2.0%, VO2 = 3.8%, VCO2 = 3.7%). The intra and inter K5 reliability assessment reveled excellent ICCs (>0.99), MAPE <2% (no significant differences between trials), TE < or around 1%, MDC
Conclusions
K5 in BxB mode is a valid and reliable system for metabolic measurements. This is the first study assessing the MDC accounting only for technical variability reporting intra- and inter-units MDCs <3.3%.
Iris type:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
List of contributors:
Guidetti, Laura; Meucci, Marco; Bolletta, Francesco; Emerenziani, Gian Pietro; Gallotta, Maria Chiara; Baldari, Carlo
Authors of the University:
BALDARI CARLO
Handle:
https://iris.uniecampus.it/handle/11389/26773
Published in:
PLOS ONE
Journal
  • Overview

Overview

URL

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209925
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.7.2.0