Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIECAMPUS
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Third Mission
  • Expertise & Skills

UNI-FIND
Logo UNIECAMPUS

|

UNI-FIND

uniecampus.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Third Mission
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

L'uso della comparazione come metodologia interpretativa nell'ordinanza di rimessione n. 14329/2013 della Suprema Corte di Cassazione: similarità e differenze con il caso italiano

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2014
abstract:
The paper aims at providing a conceptual analysis of the use of juridical comparison in the sentence n. 14329/2013 of Italian Court of Cassation. More specifically, the paper analyses two case-laws of the German an Austrian Constitutional Courts and one of the European Court of Human Rights. This way, we want to show how these case-laws are not completely identical to the Italian one as the Italian Court of Cassation naively suggests. For example, the reasoning of case-law of the European Court of Human Rights reinforces juridically and culturally the idea that same-sex couples have no right to marriage, but just a right to respect for private and family life.
Iris type:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
List of contributors:
Viggiani, Giacomo
Authors of the University:
VIGGIANI GIACOMO
Handle:
https://iris.uniecampus.it/handle/11389/84775
Published in:
GENIUS
Journal
  • Overview

Overview

URL

http://www.articolo29.it/
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.9.2.0